Category Archives: “Matilda O’Donnell MacElroy”

"Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy", "The Domain", Alien Observations, criminals, Earth, force screens, IS-BE, lost battalion, lost civilizations, Roswell, The Oz Factors, The Vedas, transcripts, vested interest

THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG?

1 Comment

“The Domain has, as yet, been unable to rescue the 3,000 IS-BEs of the Expeditionary Force Battalion either.  They are forced to inhabit biological bodies on Earth.  We have been able to recognize and track most of them for the past 8,000 years. However, our attempts to communicate with them are usually futile, as they are unable to remember their true identity.

The majority of lost members of The Domain force have followed the general progression of Western civilization from India, into the Middle East, then to Chaldea, and Babylon, into Egypt, through Achaia, Greece, Rome, into Europe, to the Western Hemisphere, and then all around the world.

The members of the lost Battalion and many other IS-BEs on Earth, could be valuable citizens of The Domain, not including those who are vicious criminals or perverts.  Unfortunately, there has been no workable method conceived to emancipate the IS-BEs from Earth.

Therefore, as a matter of common logic, as well as the official policy of The Domain, it is safer and more sensible to avoid contact with the IS-BE population of Earth until such time as the proper resources can be allocated to locate and destroy  the “Old Empire” force screen and amnesia machinery and develop a therapy to restore the memory of an IS-BE.”

— Excerpted from the Top Secret transcripts published in the book, Alien Interview.

The book I wrote in 1999, The Oz Factors, discusses the subject of “vested interests”, and the adverse affect these have on problem solving and on the perception of truth.  There are a large number of professional “UFO experts” who have a very big vested interest in promoting their own personal brand of “UFO Research”.  There are a even greater number of priests of who claim to have a “exclusive monopoly” on spiritual wisdom.  Several of these self-appointed “authorities”, who earn their living by telling people what to think about the UFO phenomenon or about their own souls, have attacked the publication of Alien Interview.  In fact, these people spend a great deal of time attacking each other and their conflicting ideas, and personal agendas.  They do this for the same reason that politicians attack each other — their personal power and wealth depend on swaying public opinion toward their own brand of “truth”.

The financial vested interests of such persons are obvious: book sales, donations, tithes, speaker fees, video sales, T-shirt sales, subscription fees, television show production money, advertising income from websites, etc..  If one wishes to investigate the motivation behind the “truth”, as reported by self-appointed critics who “see all, know all, and tell all” in an effort to eliminate their “competition”, just follow the trail of money to their bank accounts and trace the sources.

I have responded publicly to negative “reviews” in which I am essentially called a liar.  (Further, I have been flattered by assertions that I have enough creative imagination to have written it myself!)  However, this does not change any of the facts of the matter, which are very, very simple:  the transcripts of the interviews at the Roswell Army Air Force base took place in July and August of 1947. They were sent to me, with personal letters and notes, from a nurse who was stationed at Roswell, N.M. in 1947.

I have received e-mails from dozens of people around the world who have advised me that the transcripts published in the book contain ideas, words, phrases, or concepts that are “just like” their own religion (fill in the blank _________ ).  Although I personally studied Dianetics and Scientology for many years, just like several million other people, doesn’t make the egg lay the chicken.  I am sure that the “similarities” claimed to exist between the transcripts and other philosophies really do exist.  It is not difficult to point out similarities between information in the transcripts and nearly any spiritual philosophy or religion.  The transcripts make it very clear that The Domain brought The Vedas to Earth about 10,000 years ago.  Most scholars will observe that The Vedas are the source material for many spiritual philosophies, and many of the religions of Earth.

However, when drawing comparisons, one must look at which came first?  The chicken or the egg?

When I received the transcripts from Matilda, I spent many months reviewing each detail of the material in an attempt to authenticate the efficacy of the transcripts and their content.  I have continued to do this, as have many others, since the transcripts were published.  It’s easy for a critic to flippantly “discredit” anything that threatens their vested interests.  Just like any politician discredits another. It’s all a part of the “games” on planet Earth.  But it doesn’t change the facts.

One of the most interesting revelations I discovered during my research indicates (and you can do the same research, if you care to) that Hubbard received his “inspiration”, from a “higher source”.  Further, Hubbard traveled extensively after WW II ended.  He was involved in 1946 with Jack Parsons, who founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which later became NASA.  He will also associated with dozens of government nuclear physicists who worked on the atomic bomb in New Mexico in 1947. (only 100 miles away from Roswell). As a spiritualist, and well-known science fiction writer during the 30s and 40s, is it not unlikely that he would have sought out information about the UFO crash at Roswell in 1947?  And, who else might have he been in communication with, on Earth, or elsewhere?

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

According to the transcripts, The Domain has been searching all over Earth for 3,000 members of their own personnel since 6,248 BCE.  The IS-BEs who were members of that “lost battalion” have been inhabiting human bodies on Earth since that time.  The Domain has been working actively to locate each of them, and help them to recover from amnesia so they can return to active duty with The Domain.  Apparently, Matilda MacElroy was one of The Domain personnel.  Therefore, what other persons could be members of The Domain, and indeed, The Domain search party?

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

The Top Secret interview transcripts of the interview at Roswell took place in July – August, 1947.  Hubbard did not publish his premier book on the subject of Dianetics until May of 1950.  Reportedly, he wrote the entire book in only 6 weeks!  (3 weeks of planning, and 3 weeks of writing).  Therefore, the publication of Dianetics was more than TWO YEARS AFTER the interview between the alien pilot and the Roswell nurse.  How many other people may have read the transcripts of these interviews?

It is not my mission to protect or defend the material in the transcripts.  They speak for themselves.  A PDF copy of the book available FREE OF CHARGE on the Internet to anyone who cares to read it, or not.

Is the subject matter of the transcripts controversial?  Does the material revealed in the transcripts step on the toes of a lot of government, religious and personal vested interests? Why would so many people be threatened, and even murdered, by governments to keep this material from the public eye since 1947?  Why did Matilda keep the transcripts hidden for 60 years, until just before her death?

— Lawrence Spencer, Editor

Originally posted 2010-03-02 12:43:41. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Share
"Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy", "The Domain", Airl, alien contact, Alien Observations, aliens, biological engineering, bodies, doll body, Domain officer class, Domain Officers, Earth, extraterrestrials, female, femanine, IS-BE, Nephilim, Roswell, sex, space travel, thought

AN ASEXUAL FEMININE PRESENCE

Leave a comment

ASEXUAL BEINGS

“…I have always felt that the alien being was not really trying to hide anything from me.  I just never got that feeling.  Her communication always seemed honest and sincere to me.  But, I suppose you can never know for sure.  I definitely feel that I shared a unique “bond” with the alien.  It was a kind of “trust” or empathy that you have with a patient, or a child.  I think this is because the alien could understand that I was really interested in “her” and had no harmful intention, nor would I allow any harm to come to her, if I could prevent it.  This was true too.

I refer to the alien as “her”.  Actually, the being was not sexual in any way, either physiologically or psychologically.  “She” did have a rather strong, feminine presence and demeanor.  However, in terms of physiology, the being was “asexual” and had no internal or external reproductive organs.  Her body was more like the body of a “doll” or “robot”.  There were no internal “organs”, as the body was not constructed of biological cells. It did have a kind of “circuit” system or electrical nervous system that ran throughout the body, but I could not understand how it worked.

In stature and appearance the body was quite short and petite.  About 40 inches tall.  The head was disproportionately large, relative to arms, legs and torso, which where thin. There were three “fingers” on each of two” hands” and “feet” which were somewhat prehensile. [i] (Footnote) The head had no operational “nose” or “mouth” or “ears”.  I understood that a space officer does not need these as space has no atmosphere to conduct sound.  Therefore, sound related sensory organs are not built into the body.  Nor does the body need to consume food, hence, the absence of a mouth.

The eyes were quite large. I was never able to determine the exact degree of visual acuity of which the eyes were capable, but I observed that her sense of sight must have been extremely acute.  I think the lenses of the eyes, which were very dark and opaque, may also have been able to detect waves or particles beyond the visual spectrum of light.  [ii]  (Footnote) I suspect that this may have included the full range of the electromagnetic spectrum,  [iii] (Footnote) or more, but I do not know this for sure.

When the being looked at me her gaze seemed to penetrate right through me, as though she had “x-ray vision”. [iv] (Footnote) I found this a little embarrassing, at first, until I realized  that she had no sexual intentions.  In fact, I don’t think she ever even had the thought that I was male or female.

It became very obvious after a short time with the being that her body did not require oxygen, food or water or any other external source of nutrition or energy.  As I learned later, this being supplied her own “energy”, which animated and operated the body.  It seemed a little bit eerie at first, but I got used to the idea.  It’s really a very, very simple body.  There is not much to it, compared to our own bodies.

Airl explained to me that it was not mechanical, like a robot, nor was it biological.  It is animated directly by her as a spiritual being. Technically, from a medical standpoint, I would say that Airl’s body could not even be called “alive”.  Her “doll” body is not a biological life form, [v] (Footnote) with cells, and so forth.

 It had a smooth skin, or covering which was gray in color.  The body was highly tolerant to changes in temperature, atmospheric conditions, and pressure.  The limbs were quite frail, without musculature. In space there is no gravity, [vi] (Footnote)so very little muscle strength is needed.  The body was used almost entirely on space craft or in low, or no-gravity environments.  Since Earth has a heavy gravity, the body was not able to walk around very well as the legs were not really suited to that purpose.  The feet and hands were quite flexible and agile however.”

— Excerpt from the Top Secret Transcripts published in the book ALIEN INTERVIEW

FOOTNOTES

[i]  “…prehensile…”

“The word is derived from the Latin term prehendere, meaning “to grasp.”  It is the quality of an organ that has adapted for grasping or holding. Examples of prehensile body parts include the tails of New World monkeys and opossums, the trunks of elephants, the tongues of giraffes, the lips of horses and the proboscides of tapir. The hands of primates are all prehensile to varying degrees, and many species (even a few humans) have prehensile feet as well. The claws of cats are also prehensile. Many extant lizards have prehensile tails (geckos, chameleons, and a species of skink). The fossil record shows prehensile tails in lizards (Simiosauria) going back many million years to the Triassic period .

Prehensility is an evolutionary adaptation that has afforded species a great natural advantage in manipulating their environment for feeding, digging, and defense. It enables many animals, such as primates, to use tools in order to complete tasks that would otherwise be impossible without highly specialized anatomy. For example, chimpanzees have the ability to use sticks to fish for termites and grubs. However, not all prehensile organs are applied to tool use- the giraffe tongue, for instance, is instead used in feeding and self-cleaning behaviors.”

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[ii] “… able to detect waves or particles beyond the visual spectrum of light.”

The visible spectrum (or sometimes called the optical spectrum) is the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that is visible to (can be detected by) the human eye. Electromagnetic radiation in this range of wavelengths is called visible light or simply light. A typical human eye will respond to wavelengths in air from about 380 to 750 nm. The corresponding wavelengths in water and other media are reduced by a factor equal to the refractive index. In terms of frequency, this corresponds to a band in the vicinity of 400-790 terahertz. A light-adapted eye generally has its maximum sensitivity at around 555 nm (540 THz), in the green region of the optical spectrum. The spectrum does not, however, contain all the corlors that the human eyes and brain can distinguish. Brown, pink, and magenta are absent, for example, because they need a mix of multiple wavelengths, preferably shades of red.

Wavelengths visible to the eye also pass through the “optical window”, the region of the electromagnetic spectrum which passes largely unattenuated through the Earth’s atmosphere (although blue light is scattered more than red light, which is the reason the sky is blue). The response of the human eye is defined by subjective testing, but the atmospheric windows are defined by physical measurement. The “visible window” is so called because it overlaps the human visible response spectrum; the near infrared windows lie just out of human response window, and the Medium Wavelength and Long Wavelength or Far Infrared are far beyond the human response region.

The eyes of many species perceive wavelengths different from the spectrum visible to the human eye. For example, many insects, such as bees, can see light in the ultraviolet, which is useful for finding nectar in flowers. For this reason, plant species whose life cycles are linked to insect pollination may owe their reproductive success to their appearance in ultraviolet light, rather than how colorful they appear to our eyes.”

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[iii] “… this may have included the full range of the electromagnetic spectrum…”

“The electromagnetic spectrum is the range of all possible electromagnetic radiation. The “electromagnetic spectrum” (usually just spectrum) of an object is the characteristic distribution of electromagnetic radiation from that object.

The electromagnetic spectrum extends from below the frequencies used for modern radio (at the long-wavelength end) through gamma radiation (at the short-wavelength end), covering wavelengths from thousands of kilometres down to a fraction the size of an atom. It’s thought that the short wavelength limit is the vicinity of the Planck length, and the long wavelength limit is the size of the universe itself, although in principle the spectrum is infinite and continuous.”

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[iv] “… her gaze seemed to penetrate right through me, as though she had “x-ray vision”. 

“In fictional stories, X-ray vision has generally been portrayed as the ability to see through layers of objects at the discretion of the holder of this superpower. People often pretend to have this ability through the use of X-ray glasses, which are a special type of “joke-around” or prank-gag toys with the secret of its “x-ray properties” being unknown. The goal is usually to see through clothing, usually to determine if someone is carrying a concealed weapon, but sometimes for purpose of seeing a person’s private parts. In the non-fictional realm, X-rays have many practical uses in the fields of science and medicine. While there are devices currently extant which can “see” through clothing (using terahertz waves), most are quite bulky. However, there are night vision equipped video cameras that can be modified to see through clothing at a frequency just below visible light.”

— Source Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[v] …”Technically, from a medical standpoint, I would say that Airl’s body could not even be called “alive”. ”

“The word “organism” may broadly be defined as an assembly of molecules that function as a more or less stable whole and has the properties of life. However, many sources, lexical and scientific, add conditions that are problematic to defining the word.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines an organism as “[an] individual animal, plant, or single-celled life form”. This definition problematically excludes non-animal and plant multi-cellular life forms such as some fungi and protista. Less controversially, perhaps, it excludes viruses and theoretically-possible man-made non-organic life forms.

Chambers Online Reference provides a much broader definition: “any living structure, such as a plant, animal, fungus or bacterium, capable of growth and reproduction”. The definition “any life form capable of independent reproduction, organic or otherwise” would encompass all cellular life, as well as the possibility of synthetic life capable of independent reproduction, but would exclude viruses, which are dependent on the biochemical machinery of a host cell for reproduction. Some may use a definition that would also include viruses.”

— Source Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[vi] “…in space there is not gravity…”

“The terms gravitation and gravity are mostly interchangeable in everyday use, but in scientific usage a distinction may be made. “Gravitation” is a general term describing the attractive influence that all objects with mass exert on each other, while “gravity” specifically refers to a force that is supposed in some theories (such as Newton’s) to be the cause of this attraction. By contrast, in general relativity gravitation is due to space-time curvatures that cause inertially moving objects to accelerate towards each other.

Isaac Newton’s theory of universal gravitation is a physical law describing the gravitational attraction between bodies with mass. It is a part of classical mechanics and was first formulated in Newton’s work Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687. In modern language it states the following:

Every point mass attracts every other point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the point masses:

where:

  • F is the magnitude of the gravitational force between the two point masses,
  • G is the gravitational constant,
  • m1 is the mass of the first point mass,
  • m2 is the mass of the second point mass,
  • r is the distance between the two point masses.”

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

Originally posted 2013-01-21 21:59:12. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Share
"Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy", The Oz Factors, Top Secret

ETHICAL IRRESOLUTION

Leave a comment

 

“August 12, 2007

Dear Lawrence,

I am typing this letter to you on my old Underwood  typewriter [i] (Footnote) that I bought after I was discharged from the Army. Somehow it seems like a fitting contrast to the subject of this letter and the documents you will find enclosed in this envelope.

The last time I spoke to you was about eight years ago.  During your brief telephone interview with me you asked me to assist you with the research for “The Oz Factors” book you were writing because you suspected that I might know something that would help your investigation into the possibility that extraterrestrial beings may have influenced the history of Earth.  When we spoke, I told you that I did not have any information that I could share with you about anything.

Since then I have read your book and found it very interesting and compelling.  You are obviously a man who has done his homework, and who could understand my own experiences.  I’ve been thinking a lot about your allusion to the old philosopher whom you paraphrased in our phone conversation: “with great power, comes great responsibility”. Although I don’t think power is pertinent in my life or to my reasons for sending you the enclosed documents, you certainly did get me thinking about my responsibility.

I have reconsidered my position, for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is my realization that you were right.  I do have a responsibility to myself, at least. I can not possibly tell you the personal Hell [ii] (Footnote) of ethical irresolution and spiritual ambivalence I have endured since 1947. I do not want to keep playing the game of “maybe I should have, or maybe I shouldn’t have”, through the rest of Eternity!

Many men have been killed to extinguish the possibility of revealing the knowledge I have helped to withhold from society, until now.  Only a small handful of people on Earth have seen and heard what I have had the burden of keeping secret for sixty years. All those years I thought that I had been entrusted with a great deal of confidence by the “powers that be” in our government, although I have often felt that power is greatly misguided, to “protect” Mankind from the certain knowledge that, not only do intelligent extraterrestrial life forms exist, but that they have and continue to aggressively monitor and invade the lives of everyone on Earth every day.

Therefore, I think the time has come to pass along my secret knowledge to someone I think will understand it. I don’t think it would be responsible of me to take the knowledge I have into the silent afterlife, beyond reach or recognition. I think there is a greater good to be served than protecting the “vested interests” for whom this information is considered a matter of “national security”, whatever that means, and is therefore justification for making it “TOP SECRET”. [iii] (Footnote)

Also, I am now 83 years old. I have decided to leave this body, which has outlasted its usefulness to me, using a painless method of self-administered euthanasia. [iv] (Footnote) I have a very few months to live, and nothing to fear or lose.“

— Excerpt from the first letter by Nurse Matilda MacElroy, published in the book ALIEN INTERVIEW, edited by Lawrence R. Spencer

[i] “… old Underwood typewriter…”

The Underwood Typewriter Company was a manufacturer of typewriters headquartered in New York City, New York. Underwood produced what is considered the first widely successful, modern typewriter. By 1939, Underwood had produced five million machines.

From 1874 the Underwood family made typewriter ribbons and carbon paper, and were among a number of firms who produced these goods for Remington. When Remington decided to start producing ribbons themselves, the Underwoods apparently decided to get into the business of manufacturing typewriters.

The original Underwood typewriter was invented by German-American Franz X. Wagner, who showed it to entrepreneur John T. Underwood. Underwood supported Wagner and bought the company, recognizing the importance of the machine. Underwood No. 1 and No. 2s, made between 1896 and 1900, had “Wagner Typewriter Co.” printed on the back.

Underwood started adding addition and subtraction devices to their typewriters in about 1910. During World War II Underwood produced M1 carbines for the war effort. Olivetti bought a controlling interest in Underwood in 1959, and completed the merger in October 1963, becoming known in the US as Olivetti-Underwood with headquarters in New York City, and entering the electromechanical calculator business. The Underwood name last appeared on Olivetti portable typewriters produced in Spain in the 1980s.

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[ii] “…personal Hell…”

“The modern English word Hell is derived from Old English hel, helle (about 725 AD) and ultimately from Proto-Germanic halja, meaning “one who covers up or hides something”.

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[iii] “…Top Secret”…

“Top Secret is the highest acknowledged level of classified information in many countries, where it is defined as material that would cause “exceptionally grave damage” to national security if disclosed. The term top secret can be applied to information, actions, organizations, projects, etc. of which any knowledge is highly restricted.”

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

[iv] “… self-administered euthanasia….”

“The term euthanasia comes from the greek words “eu” and “thanatos” which combined means “well-death” or “dying well”. Hippocrates mentions euthanasia in the Hippocratic Oath, which was written between 400 and 300 B.C.  The ancient Greeks and Romans generally did not believe that life needed to be preserved at any cost and were, in consequence, tolerant of suicide in cases where no relief could be offered to the dying or, in the case of the Stoics and Epicureans, where a person no longer cared for his life.”

— Reference:  Wikipedia.org

Originally posted 2011-04-20 16:47:23. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Share